THE BpTRU AUTOMATIC BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR COMPARED TO 24 HOUR AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING IN THE ASSESSMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION.

Beckett L, Godwin M.
Department of Family Medicine, Queen’s University, 220 Bagot Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5E9, Canada. beckettfamily@cogeco.ca

Abstract ››

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that ABPM more closely predicts target organ damage than does clinic measurement. Future guidelines may suggest ABPM as routine in the diagnosis and monitoring of hypertension. This would create difficulties as this test is expensive and often difficult to obtain. The purpose of this study is to determine the degree to which the BpTRU automatic blood pressure monitor predicts results on 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).

METHODS: A quantitative analysis comparing measured blood pressure by the BpTRU device with the mean daytime blood pressure on 24 hour ABPM. The study was conducted by the Centre for Studies in Primary Care, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada on adult primary care patients who are enrolled in two randomized controlled trials on hypertension. The main outcomes were the mean of the blood pressures measured at the three most recent office visits, the initial measurement on the BpTRU-100, the mean of the five measurements on the BpTRU monitor, and the daytime average on 24 hour ABPM.

RESULTS: The group mean of the three charted clinic measured blood pressures (150.8 (SD 10.26) / 82.9 (SD 8.44)) was not statistically different from the group mean of the initial reading on BpTRU (150.0 (SD 21.33) / 83.3 (SD 12.00)). The group mean of the average of five BpTRU readings (140.0 (SD 17.71) / 79.8 (SD 10.46)) was not statistically different from the 24 hour daytime mean on ABPM (141.5 (SD 13.25) / 79.7 (SD 7.79)). Within patients, BpTRU average correlated significantly better with daytime ambulatory pressure than did clinic averages (BpTRU r = 0.571, clinic r = 0.145). Based on assessment of sensitivity and specificity at different cut points, it is suggested that the initial treatment target using the BpTRU be set at <135/85 mmHg, but achievement of target should be confirmed using 24 hour ABPM. CONCLUSION: The BpTRU average better predicts ABPM than does the average of the blood pressures recorded on the patient chart from the three most recent visits. The BpTRU automatic clinic blood pressure monitor should be used as an adjunct to ABPM to effectively diagnose and monitor hypertension.

PMID: 15985180 [PubMed – in process]

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Unit 1, 1850 Hartley Avenue
Coquitlam, BC
Canada V3K 7A1

Toll Free: 1-866-921-7887
Direct: 604-540-7887
Fax: 604-540-7875
Email: support@BpTRU.com

Canadian Flag
About Products Customer Care Bp Learning Centre About Us Contact